In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers, while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people believe it would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different teachers every day.
Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
Nowadays, in order to improve students’ knowledge, schools have their own policies and different methods. Although some people believe that schools with one teacher for all topics are more for students, personally, I am on the side of people who strongly believe that having different teachers for different courses has more benefits for students. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, students between aged 12-18 should learn to communicate and socialize with persons with different personalities. To put it in other words, having different teachers, will pave the way for students to be familiar with a wide range of people and teach how to communicate with them. In fact, this provides a chance for them to improve their social skills. My own experience is a compelling example of what I mean. Ten years ago, I was a school student and we have a nice and friendly teacher. He taught us all of our courses, and we were familiar with his methods. In the next year, our school hired a new teacher with a different personality and all of us had problems with his methods. On the other hand, other students in other classes that in the previous year had different teachers for their lessons did not have any problem with the new teacher. This was because they know who to adapt themselves to different personalities and methods of teaching.
Moreover, having different teachers for each topic will provide a chance for students to enhance their information. To put it in other words, different people have different information, and communicating with them will help students to learn from all of their teachers and gain their knowledge. For instance, as I mentioned in the example in the past paragraph, after our school hired a new teacher, and students from the previous year from different classes join in one new class, it was crystal clear that student in our class that used to taught by a variety of teachers have more information in different topic compare to us. This was because they had taught for each topic by an expert person who had a lot of information on his topic. However, due to the fact that we had just a teacher for all of our courses we did not know too much. In fact, communicating with different people with a lot of general information helped them to enhance their knowledge.
In conclusion, according to all the reasons and examples, I strongly believe that students should have different teachers. This is because not only it provides a chance for them to learn how to communicate with different persons, but they have a lot of information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82119205298 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7061838876 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41059602649 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9408253838 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266357544911 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958051695287 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615040275661 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189030789445 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320166725039 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.