Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, according to the rate of improvement of technology, this is very important for people in society and the government to pay more attention to the new technology and their benefits. Personally, I strongly believe that governments should provide a situation for people to have free Internet access. I feel this way for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
To begin with, I believe that having free access to the internet will pave the way for people to save their time. To put it in other words, according to the new technology many new facilities and applications have been invented that work with computers and having access to the Internet. Therefore, people can stay at their homes and do their tasks as quickly as possible, even less than a blink of an eye rather than go out and waste their time to do some simple duties. For instance, five years ago, I used to ask a loan from a bank by going to the bank during heavy traffic and filled a lot of forms that took lots of time, but, today, I can order for a loan from a bank by turning on my computer and connect to the Internet, then go to the website, and finally, do some clicks. Moreover, I do all of these works form my office in less than five minutes. So, the Internet helps me to save my time and allocate it in other ways that I prefer.
Moreover, if governments pay more attention to provide access to the Internet for their citizens, in fact, they will help people to save money. To be more specific, in this way governments will encourage people to do their duties at their home rather than use their personal car or public transportation and go out to do their tasks. This is because having access to the internet will help us to do lots of our tasks at home. Consequently, in this way, we do not have to go out and pay for some regular costs for our car. For example, as I mentioned in the example in the past paragraph, because I can do all of my tasks by the internet, I never use my car to go bank, and as a result, I spend less money to fuel, gas or some unpredictable happening such as an accident. Therefore, governments will provide a chance for me to save money.
In conclusion, according to all the reasons and examples, I strongly believe that governments should offer Internet access to citizens. This is because in this way, not only people can save their time, but they can save their money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43792325056 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56335625015 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431151241535 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5096601345 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.647058824 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0588235294 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1764705882 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267557587406 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107047240646 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634262655405 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180821550134 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242513398676 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.