Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists th

Essay topics:

Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than
by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.

Use reasons and examples to support your position.

Nowadays, it is very important and beneficial for us to be able to work as a team member in a group or team with others on the same project. Although some people believe it is more helpful for a group when other people in a team change their mind in a way that he or she believes, personally, I strongly believe that it is much better for a team when their members pay attention and obey the others.

To begin with, if all the team members have the same idea and do whatever the other wants, then they are very successful. To be more specific, in this way all the members have an agreement about their goal and the method that they want to use to gain their results. Therefore, there is not any debate on it, and they have enough concentration to do their tasks rather than waste their energy and time to persuade each other. For instance, ten years ago, I was a student at a university. Two of my classmates and I supposed to work on a project as a team. Then, in the first step, we selected one of us as a leader of the team. As a next step, we talked about our method and clarified our duties. Therefore, we believed in each other and did our best to have a perfect output. During the project, we had a lot of meetings in order to share and update our information and solve our problems. All of these arrangements helped us to focus on our duties and had an excellent presentation of our project.

Moreover, insisting on our believes in a group rather than change our minds is a cause of distress in a team. To put it in other words, when someone is biased on his mind, it makes a lot of debates and conflicts in a team. It is clear that during this challenge and process many members may resent the others and leave the group. Therefore, all of these problems and useless debates make distress and harm for the team. For example, as I mention in the example in the past paragraph, there was another team in our class, and they were supposed to do on their project. Due to we select one of our team members as a leader, in the first step, we never had any problem during our work. On the other hand, they did not do the same as us, and they had many problems from the beginning of their project. Each of the people of their team did whatever wanted and never paid attention to the others. Sometimes, they did what the other member has done, in fact, they did some repeated work and near the deadline, they experience a lot of stress due to many tasks that they could not do. Therefore, they could not meet the deadline and miss their project.

In Conclusion, according to all the reasons and the examples, I strongly believe that it is more helpful for a team if all the members obey the others. This is because, in this way not only they are successful, but they do not experience any stress.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...r goal and the method that they want to use to gain their results. Therefore, there...
^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
... project. Moreover, insisting on our believes in a group rather than change our minds...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28813559322 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37715664238 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403013182674 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6051570599 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171049120966 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056508722332 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452041099086 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124583674837 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394196702665 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.