In many places, students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school. Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning, but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning would be better for students. Which view do you agree with and why?
By and large, it has turned into a convention for most schools around the world to start their classes early in the morning, since many people believe that starting school earlier in the day is more beneficial for students. However, some people hold contradictory opinions about school routines and argue that schools should start their programs from later in the morning. I prefer the latter suggestion. Two reasons are elaborately discussed in the following to substantiate my perspective.
Firstly, my conviction is that starting the school day at a later time in the morning helps students to attend classes with more energy. As a widely acknowledged fact, it is clear that students should have enough sleep during the nights before their school days. A sound sleep cheers children up and enables them to have better concentration during classes and they will not get disturbed easily. If they do not have enough sleep, they won’t be capable of having maximum efficiency during class sessions. As a result, by attending classes later in the morning, they compensate for sleep deficiency, which in turn provides them with a sharper mind that is ready to absorb all the materials that teacher covers during the class. In contrast, starting classes too early discourages students from being mentally present in the class. So, starting early is a burden for those students who suffer from sleep problems and are sleep deprived. Moreover, as we know people have different sleep routines and not everyone is an early-bird. By starting classes later, not only can everyone participate in the class with more energy, but also it helps night-owl people to get out of bed easier in the morning.
Secondly, starting school later in the morning can reduce a noticeable amount of traffic and noise in the morning. In other words, most people start their job early in the morning, or employees have to be at the office in the early hours. Consequently, a numerous number of people have to travel from their home to their workplaces and it results in hectic mornings in which we can observe huge crowds in the occupying subway stations or highways. As a result, starting classes later can be a remedy to these problems, since in this way many school buses will be reduced from the traffic in rush hours. Likewise, many parents use their cars to drive their children to school. So, fewer cars hitting the road will decrease noise and the jam-up traffic we usually observe in the early mornings. This method has been used occasionally by many large cities. For example, in our town, on days when the air quality is in a poor condition, the municipality asks schools to start their classes at a later time in the morning. As a result, they can manage air pollution in this way by reducing the number of cars that are being used in the morning and making traffic more smooth and steady during the day.
According to the reasons mentioned above, it can be concluded that starting classes early in the morning has more cons than pros and it may sound like a better idea to take advantage of starting classes later in the morning. By doing that, students attend classes with more energy and also the city will experience less traffic and pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in contrast, as a result, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 552.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8768115942 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50283130999 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452898550725 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.534572874 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33143601754 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105673447206 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956320949386 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22479207552 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07439932315 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.