Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past. Which one of the following measure do you think can help children (age 5~10) behave better?
A. Control the time they spend on TV or movie.
B. Take more time to chat with children.
C. Monitor the interaction between children and their peers
Nowadays, kids have widespread behavior, which did not happen in the past. Notably, it seems that between five til ten of their age. Majority of approaches available to enhance the behavior of children these days. Although, In my idea, it is better to observe the action of children and making the right decision for controlling them from the social and economic aspects. This essay attends to examine this approach to developing children's behavior.
In the first step, the monitoring community of children and peers can give us social characteristics that play an essential role for the parent. A way of explanation, in the group of children, it is the trend to mimic a vital pattern of behavior that reshapes their personality. In some cases, a few girls have participated in some social activities that can be acted by peers as managers. However, it is not clear where and what is the origin of the pattern. Moreover, a significant role of the mother is that they should have a path communication skill to discover a model of behavior that is very close to their children. To sum up, from my point of view, concentration in some social activities of boys and girls can help the parent to develop the behavior of their children.
Something is clear from the mind that having a connection close to the boy and girls can avoid extra wasting money to treat their behavior in the future. For example, a massive budget around the world has been invested these days by a few countries as more developing countries to improve their educational system annually. Nonetheless, if they can understand the role of children in a little group directly, they will manage the money for the correct path of life and help to grow personal attitudes. In other words, the facilities can exert a direct positive impact in an educational context on the children and can engineer the behavior at a specific age. Consequently, i believe that consider the children is more valuable in wasting money to hire psychologists to treat them.
It seems that in less developed countries, the majority of the family focus on the managing time of children with TV. Even this method have their value for the parent. For instance, the majority of aggressive program has been limited by the parent to prevent showing for their children. However, it is not accurate from the psychologist's vision that defines the children for something, and it causes isolation kids. Besides, attending the children in a social group with peers can be beneficial for both boys, girls, and families to improve their social skills.
In conclusion, I defiantly believe that parent should observe and monitor the children to know better the variety of type of pattern which has a positive and negative impact on the children’s behavior and it prevents to spend more money for treating the social disorder and invest money for developing an educational system for them in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very close to their children. To sum up, from my point of view, concentration in ...
^^
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...havior at a specific age. Consequently, i believe that consider the children is m...
^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...veloping an educational system for them in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94534412955 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75037752643 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457489878543 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8818395738 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.045454545 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297594207339 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974618271202 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563194720598 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187363534635 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202223630268 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.