Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.
No one can cast doubt on the fact that education is one of the most important building blocks of the socirty, and the educating methods applied in universites and high schools can play a vital rule role in the future of individuals and the society as whole. The controversial question which arises here is whether, all member of a group wrking on a project shoud recieve the same mark or not. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that all students in a group should be graded the same. To support this, there are several reasons two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that working in a group is very demanding, and each members are required to shoulder some responsibilities. Since, schools and universities are smal models of real society, in the real society all peole are supposed to work in small or large groups for a certain goal. Needless to say, in the schools' group, students also have the one main goal which is getting high mark in the project. As a result evaluating all memebers of a group by giving them the same grade, can be considered as a better approach which benefits students, and they can learn how to accept resposiblities which is an essential abbility every one should achieved.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that, this approach not only improve the resposibilities of students, but also help them to develop some other aspects of their personal characteristics. It is likey that in each group, there may be some lazy people who do not accept the any duty and do't help other members to reduce the tension on their shoulder, as a result other members try to solve the problems in themselves and make that people to work the same they do by the helping hand of some friendly approches, through wich they activate the lazy member and still stay friend with each other as a memeber of the group. It goes without saying that, by participating in groups that all members will be sized up by the same number, the students learn the ability of problem solving and they also learn how to be tolerate towards some challenges. For exampl, a couple of years ago, I was working in a project with other people as a group. One of our collegues did not accept responsibilities and her behavior made us anxious, but we planned to talk to her and reveal the importance of her role in the final result which all of us will be evaluated as the same. It worked an she joined us to continue tasks shoulder by shoulder of eachother. This experience showed me that I have to control myself in difficult situation and make the best decision. Had I not expericed that situation, I would have not been this mature person that I am now.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that giving all member ofa group the same grade is more practical approach. The fact that helping students to accept rsposibilities, coupled with making them a more mature person, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1207, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ill be evaluated as the same. It worked an she joined us to continue tasks shoulde...
^^
Line 3, column 1207, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'she'?
Suggestion: an; she
...ill be evaluated as the same. It worked an she joined us to continue tasks shoulder by...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2534.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63254113346 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68285381907 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477148080439 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.4977353776 48.9658058833 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.777777778 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3888888889 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341694924854 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111758607159 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968702598513 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233907274513 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532844915817 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.