Nowadays people are more willing to help the people they do not know (for example, giving clothing and food to the people who need them) than people were in the past.
With the development of society, the government attaches greater importance to adopting measures to improve people's life quality. Some people claim that providing citizens with free Internet access will increase the financial burden, so the government should not offer the Internet without paying. However, my view is that free Internet access will enhance citizens' sense of happiness greatly.
To begin with, the free Internet access provided by the government can improve individuals' study and work efficiency. Having a glimpse of the current situation in society, we may marvel at the plenty and diversity of information the Internet can provide. Individuals can search for any message they need only by clicking a mouse, which is convenient for their study. Moreover, with the popularity of the computer, individuals can access online classes no matter where and when they want. And with the aid of teaching videos, they can review the class many times to understand knowledge thoroughly. Furthermore, when individuals encounter some difficult problems, if they want to solve them on their own, it will be a waste of time and may not pay off. In contrast, with the aid of the Internet, they can use e-mails, MSN, and QQ to chat with their professors or classmates to obtain help. As a result, there is every reason to believe that free Internet access is helpful to enhance people's efficiency due to the abundant information and teaching resources it has.
In addition, the free Internet access supplied by the government can make people's life more colorful and relaxable. For one thing, due to the huge assignments people need to do nowadays, they have to live at a fast pace and have no time to cook. In this case, with the help of the Internet, they can order online and wait at home to achieve their dinner without waiting in line. With the time saved from no cooking and no dish-washing, they can have a good rest. Moreover, ordering online can also help them to save money because the price of dishes online is cheaper than in the restaurant. For another, due to the fierce competition today, people always have immense pressure and feel tired. Under this circumstance, people can access diverse entertainment through the free Internet, such as watching films, reading news, and playing video games, which helping them to release the pressure and enjoy life. Consequently, there is sufficient evidence to believe that free Internet access can help people save time and feel relaxable owing to the convenience and entertainment it has.
It is true that providing citizens with free Internet will increase the government's financial burden. However, it's worth it for the government to do this because it enhances the citizen's life quality greatly. From what has been discussed above, I drew a conclusion that it is more advisable for the government to offer free Internet to citizens as it can enhance working efficiency and help people feel relaxed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ment to do this because it enhances the citizens life quality greatly. From what has bee...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, for one thing, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08401639344 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6901102069 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477459016393 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6078810612 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.772727273 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218140293235 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770598552487 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545042380529 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15034059721 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478644948764 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.