Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don’t know (for example, giving food and clothes to the people who need them) than they were in the past
In today’s world, helping to poor people are dependent on many assorted factors is a master key. Individual and social factors like social and personal influence helping to people. A question, which is the matter of debate, a polemical one, people are more willing to help the others people in presence or in the past. Although, it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to great on the belief that people willing to help in today.
To commence; one of the compelling reason that approves the thesis is the social network which during the day people spend a lot of time to used them. To put in in general word, people are affected by these networks more and more because of their lifestyle in modern communities. Simply stated, the huge of advertisement and clips or photos in these networks can change the mind of people to define more time and money to help another people. For instance, a clip or photo, which is about the poor people or a poor country, can raise the emotional feeling of people about those things. Needles to day that, an effective photo that spread into the body of community has profoundly effect on people decision for help, due to this matter, Charities used these tools to get more money from people. To shed more light on this issue, according to the published results in Elsevier journal, the majority of people like to help the people by charities, because they do not have more time to help the people directly.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated in above, the level of welfare of people in higher than the past which allow them to help another people. To clarify, in recent decades, income level of people raised and they can separate a portion of their income for helping to the people. To delineate on, people with high level of welfare can think about poor people and this matter can be the concern of them. For example when we are poor, we can not help other people and we can’t think about them. What I mention in above might not be generalized to all contexts, some people who receive huge amount of money and they are welfare. Nonetheless, they do not help to another people.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are some exceptions, which are excluded from the general rules, I do agree that today’s people more help to another people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich during the day people spend a lot of time to used them. To put in in general ...
^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...end a lot of time to used them. To put in in general word, people are affected by th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39212225062 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459854014599 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9471103623 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.823529412 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399397062601 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14870241372 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595984323554 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249445666577 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690961807208 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.