Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion?
It is true that the parents in Asian society hope to give all properties to their kids as the name of love. Nevertheless, this kind of “love” cannot help their children to grow into mature and wise individuals but bring them troubles instead.
To begin with, money management is an important part of modern life. Children who are given money for nothing also have high chances that they are going to encounter great difficult at some point of their lives. Many people, and children of the wealthy in particular, like to squander all their money on things they enjoy such as expensive cars or fashionable clothes even though they are unearned. Squandering money like this, they will not be able to deal with troubles such as sudden unemployment, and harsh economic situations.
Aside from consuming, a good habit acquired in the formative years of a child is very likely to last a lifetime. However, many young people only start to learn this upon their adulthood and this usually does not work because very quickly they would find that they fall into the old habit. The children who are given weekly are surely unnecessary to do saving plans whereas when they grow up, they have to face the problem. This is relatively easier to learn when there is parental help and guidance. Less meaningless giving will increase the chance to managing.
Some may worry that space should be given to children that they can buy something which doesn’t need to be informed in family. After all, everyone has something secret. However, in light of the above-mentioned need, I suggest that the parents can give children money according to their academic performance or household helping, and make a permission that rational proportion of purchasing are complete free to tell the parents. That way they are making sure that given money does help to children’s growth.
We can therefore conclude that because personal finance is so important to children that parents cannot give money weekly in haste.
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at s 86
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity, such as the job you have never done before. Under this circumstance, do you prefer to work alone or work with others? 83
- 7.Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school, which way can bring them the most benefit?1)to accumulate work experience by a part-time job or volunteering in a community2)learning to play a sport3)learning to play a musical inst 86
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at s 86
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'worries'.
Suggestion: worries
...ase the chance to managing. Some may worry that space should be given to children ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, after all, in particular, kind of, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15548780488 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24660481377 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8325405763 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6875 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32874963435 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100517421741 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543134904862 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182135457919 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379302647383 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.