In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
The world is changing everyday according to its natural activities and human activities. Globally the need of people has been increasing day by day. Companies and industries have been evolving and so do the job prospect. The way everything is changing, there is change in peoples attitude towards their job. In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job wpuld lead to a secure, successful future? So, when considering was it easier to identify which type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. I would have to say I do agree with the statement.
The first reason is that, having less competition had made it easier in the past to identify secure career. In the past, there was less competition among people which lead them to have more chances of getting into the job easily compare to early days. For example, There was my uncle who use to share about his personal life matters and one day I asked him about the job prospect during his time. He mentioned that he studied electrical engineering looking at its future and when he graduated he experienced the same thing what he thought before graduation. He got good job without much effort as there were very less competition. But, today when I studied same faculty after talking him the scenario was quite opposite. I found myself having hard time getting the job due high competition among people for the same job. That’s why, with less competition they had more secure career in the past.
The second reason is that, with less number of graduate provided more opportunity in the past. In the past people graduating from same faculty were very less and not every one was trying to pursue the degree so manpower were less in different field which leads of having more opportunities. For example, when I started my first job, there was my senior, who was also an electrical engineer. When I said him about the job opportunities of electrical engineering in these early days and how difficult it is to get the job these days because of high number of electrical engineers and less job opportunities. He explained that, in the past due to less number of manpower there were always a better opportunities to get a job. In fact, when my boss applied for the job in his time in three companies he got call from all three companies as there were less number of electrical engineers at that time in the market which provided him better job opportunities. This is why, I believe with more opportunities that earlier days people found more secured job identifying it earlier.
In sum, though many people believe find it easier to identify career that would lead to secure future, with less competition and more opportunities in the past it was easier to identify job that would lead to more secure career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ys. For example, There was my uncle who use to share about his personal life matte...
^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r example, There was my uncle who use to share about his personal life matters an...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...was also an electrical engineer. When I said him about the job opportunities of elec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72540983607 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60700519403 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415983606557 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7213707188 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.260869565 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.60869565217 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412294902557 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139007373225 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178486377913 0.0737576698707 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335412149824 0.150856017488 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143997098936 0.0645574589148 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.