The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.

Essay topics:

The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.

Some people believe that to prepare people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition where as other contends with the statement. Personally, I beleive that instilling a sense of cooperation makes a better leader beacause it creates in them a sense of emotional attachment, generousity and respect towards people.

Initially, when people come with the vision of being a leader as a motive of competition, then it creates a violent act to do to achieve the goal because it becomes a sense to win against other rather than being a good leader for people. But, when people come with a vision of cooperation then, they have the feeling of attachment towards their people. With cooperation, a good leader can be formed without any selfishness about them and their people but, with competition, a violent leader can only be formed.

Also, a good leader have vision for the development of their people and their nation so, it leads them in a right path to develop and fight against corruption. But, to win thinking it as a competition, a leader can be formed by doing violent acts, corruption, investing money, which leads them to act against the development of people and nation. For example, when I was studying my undergraduate, there was a guy, who wanted to be a leader in an opposite of a person having vision towards students and college. But as it was a competition for the one won by all wrong movements and did nothing good for anyone. So, skills and vision is also visualize by people beahviour. Therefore, a good leader can be formed only by cooperation.

Finally, cooperation helps people to be among their citizen emotionally attached with their problems and they have the real feelings of their citizens problems which after being a leader fight to solve. But a leader won by competition have attachement that is felt by them emotionally but, to gain the sympathy to win which never help any citizen in solving their issues. For example, consistency of being leader every year by vote is only possible if they won by winning the hearts of people rather acting or showing any negative behaviour towards them.

In summation, I beleive a good leader help and makes a better nation for their citizen, which only can happen, if they cooperation among people rathaer than competition to win.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition ...
^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...a sense of cooperation, not competition where as other contends with the statement. Pers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 643, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'visualized'.
Suggestion: visualized
...r anyone. So, skills and vision is also visualize by people beahviour. Therefore, a good ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...happen, if they cooperation among people rathaer than competition to win.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91358024691 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79528202247 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417283950617 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3110325873 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23168435497 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102052195983 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115587658086 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168057891902 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133294791437 0.0667264976115 200% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.