Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.

Work is very important in our life. Everything we do for a living is work and without doing work we would not be able to achieve any goal of our life. Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? So, when considering whether to work with a group or to work independently, I would say, working with a group of people on a team is better.
The first reason is that working in a team helps to complete the work in a short period. A lot of members of a team helps to divide work among team members so, we can complete the job in a short period. For example, when I was doing my job, I got a project to build a small bridge. After getting the job to build a bridge, I managed to form a team with members of different departments. we, team members, started our planning phase and divided our work like surveying, planning, implementation. Each of our members did best and performed well for which, we were able to complete the project a month earlier than the deadline. So, working in a team helps to do the job in a short period.
The second reason is that working with a group of people on a team makes a convenient way of completing the job with better results and better efficiency. While working with the team, many people are working on the same project. And, each of them is concerned about the project so they know if anything goes wrong by some individual members of the team, they are there to correct it. For example, when we started our bridge project, some of our members did mistakes unknowingly which later on was noticed by another member and helped to make it right. so, it was the team who helped when mistakes happened. In this way, mistakes were determined and the project was completed making a good quality of bridge in design and structure. So, working with the team always helps to do the job in a more efficient way than working independently.
That is why I believe when working with a group of people creates an environment where we get to learn from other mistakes and also make it right for better results by helping each other.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...with members of different departments. we, team members, started our planning pha...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'mistake'
Suggestion: mistake
...bridge project, some of our members did mistakes unknowingly which later on was noticed ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...her member and helped to make it right. so, it was the team who helped when mistak...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35279187817 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52907160838 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418781725888 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0223318405 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2631578947 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362361339859 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163506892309 0.076458572812 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165695796886 0.0737576698707 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256271309658 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144823370303 0.0645574589148 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.