People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things; other people learn by reading about things; others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your opinion
Learning is something that people must do in their life. Different condition asks different way to learn. I think there is no best way to learn, each way depends on condition. But, generally I choose learning by doing. This is like one package of learning course, we can feel, hear, see the subject.
In some other cases, learning can be better from only hearing. There are many thing in this world that can be understood not by doing or seeing, but only listen to the news. Usually it relates to life way things. For example, a crime case. For learning the effect of doing this, we do not need to do as a criminal. If our neighbor involve in the crime, we will hear people talk about him, radio report the crime news, his parents will be ashamed. Then we understand that it is bad, we will not want to have the same condition as him.
Somehow, listening to people talk can cause a missed-understanding. At dinner time, my mom gives me advice how to mix chocolate properly, but she only talks and I never see it directly, so it is little hard for me to visualize her hand technique in mixing the chocolate.In this case, I need not only see or hear but also do this by myself, so that I can understand completely the technique. As people say, practice makes perfect.
Overall, we cannot generalize the best way to learn something, every way is best in each condition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to learn'.
Suggestion: to learn
...s on condition. But, generally I choose learning by doing. This is like one package of l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
... be better from only hearing. There are many thing in this world that can be understood no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'things'?
Suggestion: things
...etter from only hearing. There are many thing in this world that can be understood no...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... condition as him. Somehow, listening to people talk can cause a missed-unders...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...missed-understanding. At dinner time, my mom gives me advice how to mix chocolate...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... hand technique in mixing the chocolate.In this case, I need not only see or hear ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.504 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61993587708 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 618.680645161 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.4322576739 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.375 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319684893307 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115135318107 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719863532032 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185936786537 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876061520261 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 86.8835125448 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.