People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things; other people learn by reading about things; others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your choice.
In recent times, there has been a widespread debate on the best way of learning. While some people prefer to learn by reading some books or listening to some lectures, I hold the opposite view. I think the best way of learning is by experience the task and doing it. I feel this way for a couple of reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, when people learn by performing the task, they can encounter the real subject. They will be able to practice the task directly in the field without doubting about the right information. For example, after I graduated from the university, I worked in the hospital as a pharmacist. At first, I realized that most of the classes that I learned during my pharmacy school are not applicable in the work field. Many books and lectures had obsolete information and most of them were not related to the real experience. As a result, I took some inpatient pharmacy training to learn how to prepare the correct medication and give it to the right patient. This program took me one year to learn all the skills that are required to fit the position. Therefore, I was able to master all the pharmacy procedures from practicing them in reality. Indeed, I think a lot of universities should change the style of learning from reading and listening to practice and doing the real task. This will allow students to know better about the task and get the exact information.
Adding to the previous point, when people learn by practice, they can learn better because this style of learning is very attractive. It enables people to be more engaged in the work field and has more energy. For instance, imagine a teacher at university who is giving a lecture for students or assigning a reading task for them, most students will feel bored and sometimes they fall to sleep because this is an attractive style of learning. However, if students practice in the field; they would be more energetic and engaging all the time.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that learning by doing things is the most significant way of learning. This is because it allows people to come across the real task, and it is an attractive and amazing style of learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...I took some inpatient pharmacy training to learn how to prepare the correct medication a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...eople learn by practice, they can learn better because this style of learning is very ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re energetic and engaging all the time. In conclusion, I strongly believe that l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67958656331 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58947219797 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475452196382 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9919108024 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.55 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285729833336 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907538932784 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839973092917 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192207366524 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03863312223 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.