People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
It is undeniable that having a tutor or a teacher is essential in the learning process. He usually helps in making studying easier. However, there is a critical question, who should be the teacher? In my view, people learn things better from those at higher level, such as teachers or supervisors than from those at their own level, such as fellow students or co-workers. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
first, generally, teachers have a comprehensive knowledge about the topic they are going to teach, so this will make their students have full understanding about it. For instance, my younger brother Sami is a pharmacy student who is going to graduate next semester. Last year, due to being sick for almost one week, he lost many classs in the pharmacology course. In response, he tried to overcome that by asking his friend for help, but unfortunately, it was a bad decision. His friend did not understand the course correctly that caused Sami to fail his test. My brother learned from that incedience that he has to go to the professor for any studying related issues.
Second, supervisors in any work place are people that have the higher experience. That means they are right candidates for new employees' training. For example, when sami started his training at Appot pharmaceutical company, he faced many obstacles on dealing with their computer system. In contrast, his co-workers tried to explain it to him, but it was without any benefit. he spent three weeks on the first step of this complicated system which means his training time was running out with no improvement. This made him stressed and worried about his remaining time, but he had a friendly manager who offered him a three days intensive training with a full coverage of all needed information. She gave him the guideline followed by ideal practicing for each case. After he finished this three days, he was grateful that he has such good boss.
To sum up, I strongly believe that people learn things better from supervisors or teachers than from colleagues or co-workers. It is not only because of teachers' knowledge, but also they are expert, so they can illustrate any information and simplify it to be easier for people to understand. Moreover, I suggest that teachers and supervisors should assign two or more hours per week for students that have any question, and I am sure that they will appreciated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... will explore in the following essay. first, generally, teachers have a comprehensi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...to him, but it was without any benefit. he spent three weeks on the first step of ...
^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...him a three days intensive training with a full coverage of all needed informatio...
^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, but also they are expert, so they can illustrate any information and simplify ...
^^
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'appreciate'
Suggestion: appreciate
... question, and I am sure that they will appreciated.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in contrast, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87922705314 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71977244038 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553140096618 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.60981439 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30091026167 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837781644239 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189923980273 0.0737576698707 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230257270687 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217534778216 0.0645574589148 337% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.