People should sometimes do things they do not enjoy doing.
We can see many people say ‘Just enjoy your life’ and that is the most important thing for happy life. But every people can’t live only doing what they want to do. I totally agree that people should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing.
First of all, people should get a job whether they want or not. For living, people need to earn some money. We need to buy some food, rent a house, and purchase some clothes for sustain our lives. Some people may love their job and enjoy what they do in their workplaces. However, most people get a job only for earing house stocks. Many of my friends usually say that don’t want to go work and want to rest forever. I definitely sympathize with them. But almost every people in the world can’t live without earning money.
Secondly, we are not supposed to do something harmful to other people. Some behaviors from us can give negative effects to other people and if we want to avoid those behaviors, we need to do something not enjoyable. For example, many people don’t like handle garbage from foods. But if they just leave the waste, the foods will smell bad and other people would feel bad. People should throw the waste appropriately after they eat something. We should think about other people.
To sum up, we can’t live well if we only do what we want. Sometimes people have to do something not enjoyable. We need to have responsibility for ourselves and we don’t have any authority to bother others.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 264.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69318181818 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40185866485 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4438106423 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.95 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395060520943 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146605822145 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191486603736 0.0737576698707 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280945710656 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176394432554 0.0645574589148 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.03 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 86.8835125448 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.