people spend monay on long lasting thinhs such as jewelry other spend on short lived pleasure like travelling prefer

Essay topics:

people spend monay on long lasting thinhs such as jewelry, other spend on short lived pleasure like travelling, prefer

BY and large, it is established beyond doubt that with advancement and modernization of world, people are thriving hard to raise the standards of their lives and earn high salaries. In this regard, ways to spend the hard earned money is of paramount importance. There are different schools of thought among the individuals to utilize their incomes. Where some reckon to spend it on short lived happinesses such as travelling , others contemplate to spend it on thing that are long lasting. If i were asked, I would champion to the notion of spending on long lasting items, such as expensive jewelry. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The fist compelling reason corroborating my stance is associated with the notion that people save their money for future use by spending them on long lasting items.To be more specific, buying jewley or other such expensive items are like saving in banks. It is noteable that people's situations do not remain stable in this fast paced world, people come across certain financial crises or losses because of a myriad of circumstances I.e job losses, health problems, helpings loved ones and many more. In such condition, if people have something in their hand they can utilize that to come out of difficuly situations. By the way opf illustration, five years ago, My husband was laid off from his job withoput any notice because of his comapany crises. It was quite schocking for us to pay the mortgage of our house at that time. But we overcame the problem after selling my gold jewlery which i had bought previously. It really helped us to pay off our mortgage of the house. If I had not bought the jewlery, We would n ot have been able to payed our house mortgage.
The second reason behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that Spending on permanent items results in self-satisfaction due to imroved others perceptions about one's living standard. It is worth mentioning that jewelry and other such items are extremely appealing to the public and usually a standard of high status in a society.when other people cherish by the visual attraction of our personal item, it resulted in extreme satisfaction and pleasure. My sister's experience is striking example. Last year, she bought diamond jewelry and wore it on our family relative' wedding. people got astonished by their stunning appearance, and my sister started satisfaction and happiness too
BY perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that people who spend on luxury items are more profitable than who spend their money all at once in traveling. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, spending on expensive items is like an investment for future. Second, It improves individual's impression on other that results in contentment.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ort lived happinesses such as travelling , others contemplate to spend it on thing...
^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d it on thing that are long lasting. If i were asked, I would champion to the not...
^
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... by spending them on long lasting items.To be more specific, buying jewley or othe...
^^
Line 2, column 892, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lem after selling my gold jewlery which i had bought previously. It really helped...
^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...wore it on our family relative wedding. people got astonished by their stunning appear...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...n luxury items are more profitable than who spend their money all at once in travel...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, such as, by and large, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96602972399 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77757954183 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8896243676 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.318181818 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303171287425 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767814832627 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960850789034 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189990105574 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708074511436 0.0645574589148 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ort lived happinesses such as travelling , others contemplate to spend it on thing...
^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d it on thing that are long lasting. If i were asked, I would champion to the not...
^
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... by spending them on long lasting items.To be more specific, buying jewley or othe...
^^
Line 2, column 892, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lem after selling my gold jewlery which i had bought previously. It really helped...
^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...wore it on our family relative wedding. people got astonished by their stunning appear...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...n luxury items are more profitable than who spend their money all at once in travel...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, such as, by and large, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96602972399 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77757954183 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8896243676 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.318181818 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303171287425 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767814832627 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960850789034 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189990105574 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708074511436 0.0645574589148 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.