If universities are given financial support to develop researches which one do you think would receive more benefits To predict weather more accurately To clean rivers and oceans To deal with outer space

Essay topics:

. If universities are given financial support to develop researches,
which one do you think would receive more benefits?
To predict weather more accurately
To clean rivers and oceans.
To deal with outer space

n today's modern epoch, usually educational programs, infrastructures, institutions, and organizations are the mainstays of scientific explorations. Hence, they are bestowed remarkable amounts of budget to accomplish scientific researches. According to my standpoint, Fund should be devoted to programs provided their benefits outweigh the number of funds they are allocated, and I think one of such options would best be to conduct research to clean and purify rivers and oceans. Here is why:
To begin with, to save our potable invaluable liquid, water, it's vitally critical to secure or conserve our available and meteoric water. For one thing, should negative impacts of potable water contamination awareness not be taken seriously, there will not be any conservative water programs, and governments are not likely to be compelled to fine industrialization firms and factories, which foul our drinkable water, which is critically in a meager fraction. If this happens consistently with no laws enacting against water pollution, soon then we shall lose our vital potable water, in dramatic cases, our existence.
Meanwhile, researching water preservation on oceanic water, will, too, save and protect aquatic lives. As a result of extreme exploitation of sea trade and the establishment of water routes, oceans have significantly become fouled, which caused many marine species to have become extinct, and many are already endangered, so it is for us to protect our oceans to save those organisms which are water-depended and are prone to extinction in polluted_water. Otherwise, we may soon relinquish them
In a nutshell, should I had the opportunity, I would undoubtedly conduct research to secure and clean lakes and oceans so that to reserve potable water and to protect marine lives; thus, I would highly recommend universities and colleges to conduct research in this area.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n todays modern epoch, usually educationa...
^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... researches. According to my standpoint, Fund should be devoted to programs provi...
^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d purify rivers and oceans. Here is why: To begin with, to save our potable inval...
^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Otherwise, we may soon relinquish them In a nutshell, should I had the opportun...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, then, thus, while, i think, as a result, for one thing, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48109965636 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19056573889 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.3705593347 48.9658058833 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.222222222 100.406767564 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117856919769 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486304963888 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449069169001 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813282832569 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033907806331 0.0645574589148 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 11.7677419355 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.01818996416 133% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.