which way of communication is better, talikng over phone, or talikg through text message and emials
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that with the advent in technology and advancement in society, the world has become a global village. Over the years, its infrastructure is entirely modified. In this regard, telecommunication is of paramount importance. There are different schools of thought amongst people. Where some reckon that interacting through text messages is preferable, others contemplate that communicating through talking on the phone is advantageous. As for this writer's opinion, I will champion the latter idea.In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason corroborating my idea is associated with the notion that
talking on the phone gives a better understanding of the situation. To be more specific, when people are interacting through emails or texts there are different level of understanding and comprehensions that leads to misunderstanding, and confliction as a result. However, when people are talking on call they can explain their perspective clearly leaving no room for misunderstanding. My personal experience on this matter is a compelling example. Last year, I and my colleague was working on a project and we were communicating through emails. As a result, we were unable to figure out certain issues that were creating tensions between us. Finally, I suggested my colleague to talk on call. Not only we resolved the issue but also we elimininated the stress created between us.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that talking on the phone saves time because of its convenience. It is axiomatic that emails and text messages often take longer to be delivered especially when people do not check them instantly because of busy schedule or do not have internet access. On the other hand, people then can easily increase the efficacy of their work by talking and working at the same time. By the way of illustration, I can cook and talk to my friend at the same time, it saves my time.It is crystal clear that talking on phone is b
Last compelling reason is that it enhances communication skills. It is evident that talking increases the fluency and delivery of speech, it is particularly important for introverted people that they can practice to develop confidence through taking on call. Consequently, having better communication skills leads to success in future job search because mostly employers are looking for these personal skills and characteristics.
By perusing above paragraphs, one can infer that communication through telephones are of myriad advantages. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, it helps to resolve confliction. Second, It makes our life convenient due to its efficiency.Last, it improves communicational skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... the phone is advantageous. As for this writers opinion, I will champion the latter ide...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...pinion, I will champion the latter idea.In what follows, I will delve into the mos...
^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...iend at the same time, it saves my time.It is crystal clear that talking on phone ...
^^
Line 6, column 205, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice developing'.
Suggestion: practice developing
...nt for introverted people that they can practice to develop confidence through taking on call. Cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Last
...r life convenient due to its efficiency.Last, it improves communicational skills.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, as for, as a result, by and large, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29820627803 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22760398079 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553811659193 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8353653965 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4583333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170913387095 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426080361679 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05999084832 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789082951896 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425574167598 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.