People will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years later.
Cooking has always been a populate issue. There are even more and more cooking shows, teaching people how to cook delicious food or cook quickly. Some people think that people will spend more time on cooking because the world becomes more health-conscious. If you cook food by yourself, you can choose cooking ways and healthy foods for fitness. However, people are as busy as a bee and society is changing too fast, so I think that people will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years.
First of all, people do not have enough time to cook. People have to get up early preparing to work, and work overtime due to the heavy workloads. It is too stressful for people to cook food after getting off work. For instance, my friend Vivian moved to a new apartment with a well equipped kitchen. So she decided to cook for herself every day in order to eat clean and spend less. Unfortunately, the plan had failed. The reason is that she underestimated the time and effort it would take for cooking. She needed to go to the supermarket, shop for food and then wash vegetables and wait for water to boil. Suppose that she wanted to stew or broil the meat, it would cost at lease one more hour’s time for a meal. It took a lot of time and energy to cook. Thus, she could not afford it. Accordingly, people are exhausted on account of workloads and have little time to prepare for meals, so they will reduce the time on cooking food.
Furthermore, restaurants offer healthier and cleaner food, and you would have a wide variety of choices like organic food or carb-cutting diets. In recent years, the society has been leaning towards fitness eating. Many restaurants change the way they cook: they now cook with less oil and salt in order to appeal to customers, and ordering in advance so that you do not have to wait. Dining outside is a trend because you can eat various and even more nutritious foods than you can when you cook. Besides, delivery service is a very convenient and effective way to get food. As soon as you are hungry, you can operate applications and someone will deliver food to your home. Thus, improvement of restaurants and convenient service of the society convince me that people will reduce cooking time.
Admittedly, some people might say that people will spend more time on cooking. Due to progressive kitchenware, it could make the cooking become easier so people would have more interest in cooking. However, it would still take a lot of time to cook food. To sum up, I strongly believe that people will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-09 | rsheth05 | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | rsheth05 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | TOEFLkiller | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | TOEFLkiller | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | porteghale Abiasli | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 70
- Teaching is harder than it was in the past. 76
- People will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years. 70
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Cooking has always been a populate issue. There are even more and more coo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
...u cook food by yourself, you can choose cooking ways and healthy foods for fitness. How...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, i think, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62255965293 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44814084441 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481561822126 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.953759542 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1071428571 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4642857143 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466273052717 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147333518807 0.076458572812 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133544277737 0.0737576698707 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355561886561 0.150856017488 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125796137294 0.0645574589148 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.