People will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years.
Cooking has always been a populate issue. There are even more and more cooking show, teaching people how to cook deliciously or quickly. Some people think that people will spend more time on cooking because the world becomes more health-conscious. If you cook food by yourself you can choose cooking ways and healthy foods for fitness. However, people are as busy as a bee and society is changing too fast, so I think that people will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years.
First of all, people do not have enough time to cook. People have to get up early preparing to work, and work overtime due to the heavy workloads. It is too stressful for people to cook food after getting of work. For instance, my friend Vivian moved to new apartment with well equipped kitchen. So she decided to cook for herself every day in order to eat cleanly and spend less. Unfortunately, the plan had failed. The reason is that she underestimated the time and effort it would take for cooking. She needed to go to the supermarket shopping for food and then washed vegetables and wait for water boiling. Supposed that she wanted to stew or broil the meat would cost more time for a meal at least one hour. It took a lot of time and energy to cook. Thus, she could not afford it. Accordingly, people are exhausted on account of workloads and have rare time to prepare for meals, so they will decrease the time on cooking food.
Furthermore, restaurants offer healthier and cleaner food before, and you have wide variety of choices like organic food or cutting carbs. In recent years, society has been leaning towards fitness eating. Many restaurants change the way they cook with less oil and salt in order to appeal customers, and ordering in advance so that you do not have to wait. Dining outside is an inclination because you can eat various and even more nutritious foods than you cook. Besides, delivery service is a very convenient and effective way to get food. As long as you are hungry, you operate application and they will deliver order to your home. Thus, improvement of restaurants and convenient service of society convinces me that people will reduce cooking time.
Admittedly, some people might say that people will spend more time on cooking. Due to progressive kitchenware, it could make the cooking easier to promote people’s interest in cooking. However, it is still need a lot of time ono cooking food. To sum up, I strongly believe that people will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Cooking has always been a populate issue. There are even more and more coo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
...ou cook food by yourself you can choose cooking ways and healthy foods for fitness. How...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...terest in cooking. However, it is still need a lot of time ono cooking food. To sum ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, at least, for instance, i think, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73242630385 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50916225638 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503401360544 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8463491588 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5357142857 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56814563116 0.236089414692 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164281513871 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167885868228 0.0737576698707 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424303099601 0.150856017488 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170219945209 0.0645574589148 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.