A controversial issue relating to the allocation of government funds has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged to increase their investment on developing Internet access rather than on developing public transportation. It seems obvious to many that in this new era of information the government should be concerned with the demand for faster, cheaper and better quality Internet access. On the other hand, public transport also requires a good deal of financial support from the government. These issues need to be considered as equally important.
Without a doubt, financial support should be allocated to the improvement of Internet access. Nowadays the Internet has impacted far beyond any national boundaries to all corners of the globe. Of all the resulting consequences of the Internet on this society, many of them are beneficial. However, there are also influences that could be seen asnegative and these are a concern for the government. Thus, more funds should be assignedto both of these two aspects of the Internet. One portion should be focused on developing the fast growing information technology so that people can have easier, cheaper and quicker access to legal websites, with a percentage of that funding being used to control and supervise the behavior of cyber companies and netizens to reduce potential harm. These may include spreading rumors, opening illegal and unsavory websites, delivering junk mail, sending viruses, hacker attacks and so forth.
Nonetheless, maintaining a sound public transportation system is definitely in the interest of the general public. Therefore, this also deserves attention and funding from the government. In actual fact, the continual improvements to the public transportation systems always need enormous financial support. For example, new roads have to be built and old roads must be repaired. Meanwhile, more bus routes or subways lines are being constructed and new overpasses need to be erected. In addition to the basic infrastructure, the increasing congestion and frequent traffic jams needattention and solutions. All of these projects demand a large amount of money.
In effect, every responsible citizen could be encouraged to join in the official efforts of developing and advancing a more harmonious society. As an example, it is advisable for people to report any illegal websites immediately and warn others against any possible threat of online frauds. Also, regarding public transport, all passengers could be more responsible. Private car owners could be more aware of reducing their car use during rush hours. These are simple ideas, but could be extremely worthwhile.
In conclusion, maintaining sustainable development is a common target valued in all countries today. Government officials ought to have a broader perspective when it comes to funding and avoid unilateral thinking. As a result, well-balanced investment strategies could result, ensuring steady, advanced progress of both the Internet and the public transportation systems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...em is definitely in the interest of the general public. Therefore, this also deserves attentio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...ion and funding from the government. In actual fact, the continual improvements to the publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55982905983 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04688867076 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9971706985 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3703703704 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169447291306 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467898240166 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515385938301 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983047927492 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064080765186 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 86.8835125448 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.