The reading and the lecture are both about a group of marine animals, called Agnostics. the author of the reading feels that there are three theories where the Agnostics may have lived. the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author.
To begin with, the author of the reading argues that Anostics may have been free-swimmer that preyed on the
The reading and the lecture are both about a group of marine animals, called Agnostics. The author of the reading feels that there are three theories where the Agnostics may have lived. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author.
To begin with, the author of the reading argues that Anostics may have been free-swimmer that preyed on the smaller animals. The article mentions that, other types of arthropod were able to swim, so it is reasonable that the Agnostics were swimers. This specefic argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that hunting pery needs well developed eyes. He says that Agnostic's eyes were poorly developed, even they have been blind, So it does not make sense that they were predators.
Secondly, the writer suggests that Agnostics may have lived on the seafloor. The article mentions that there are some examples of the arthopods living this way. The lecturer, However rebuts this by mentioning that it is unlikely, because seafloor dwellers are slow swimmers. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that Agnostics where found on multiple areas which shows they were able to move fast.
Finally, the author posits that it is possible that Agnostics were parasites. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that population of the parasites is not large. he notes that, we know that Agnostic's population was large, thererfore they couldn't be parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about a group of marine animals, called Agnostics. The author of the reading fee...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ies where the Agnostics may have lived. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs. Secondly, the writer suggests that Agnostics may have lived on the seafloor...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes. In contrast, the lecturers position is that population of the parasites is n...
^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...pulation of the parasites is not large. he notes that, we know that Agnostics popu...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...s population was large, thererfore they couldnt be parasites.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1977.66487455 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 231.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09956709957 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50563727908 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3738928151 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5333333333 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403856213512 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14993089122 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184431831014 0.0737576698707 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30859500506 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.351295600986 0.0645574589148 544% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.