The reading and the lecture are both about a group of marine animals, called Agnostics. the author of the reading feels that there are three theories where the Agnostics may have lived. the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author.
To begin with, the author of the reading argues that Anostics may have been free-swimmer that preyed on the
The reading and the lecture are both about a group of marine animals, called Agnostics. The author of the reading feels that there are three theories where the Agnostics may have lived. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author.
To begin with, the author of the reading argues that Anostics may have been free-swimmer that preyed on the smaller animals. The article mentions that, other types of arthropod were able to swim, so it is reasonable that the Agnostics were swimers. This specefic argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that hunting pery needs well developed eyes. He says that Agnostic's eyes were poorly developed, even they have been blind, So it does not make sense that they were predators.
Secondly, the writer suggests that Agnostics may have lived on the seafloor. The article mentions that there are some examples of the arthopods living this way. the lecturer, However rebuts this by mentioning that it is unlikely, because seafloor dwellers are slow swimmers. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that Agnostics where found on multiple areas which shows they were able to move fast.
Finally, the author posits that it is possible that Agnostics were parasites. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that population of the parasites is not large. He notes that, we know that Agnostic's population was large, thererfore they couldn't be parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about a group of marine animals, called Agnostics. The author of the reading fee...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ies where the Agnostics may have lived. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs. Secondly, the writer suggests that Agnostics may have lived on the seafloor...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...mples of the arthopods living this way. the lecturer, However rebuts this by mentio...
^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes. In contrast, the lecturers position is that population of the parasites is n...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...s population was large, thererfore they couldnt be parasites.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09956709957 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50563727908 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3738928151 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5333333333 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403856213512 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14993089122 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184431831014 0.0662205650399 279% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30859500506 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.351295600986 0.0443174109184 793% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.