Rural Development in Afghanistan
Afghanistan in arid geography, the history proven that people depends on agriculture harvests, illiteracy and war, prevent people from the usage of high-tech and modern education.
Rural development is a vital for creating an opportunity between public and government for sharing problems and finding solutions together.
Rural Development got reputation, people still don’t have a prime life facilities in the villages. Agricultural is still led by traditional methods, no sound revelatory to modernize and control annual rainfall cycle for feeding well; agriculture should be technically formed for the growth of modernizing agriculture in order to gain maximum product and restrict famine, poverty, hardships, illiteracy, insecurity and missing opportunities not to victimize the political interest of others.
There has been a concerted effort made, to reconstruct the rural in the frame of MRRD, NSP created Shuras in each village around the country as a network, help many investments to run a large number of irrigational projects by donors, UN, USAID and World Bank. Trainings and public awareness of people were made to undertake modern technological implements, consequently better selling of crops in international market. The recent rural development is not enough.
Managing water, utilizing technologies, training farmers, participating people in the rural development, support farmers and labors will result to eradicate poverty, reduce unemployment rate, and capacity building for a stable country with a perfect economic balance, If I manage to acquire better knowledge and experience from authentic address with my 5 years’ practical experiences will bring revolution in the rural development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sage of high-tech and modern education. Rural development is a vital for creatin...
^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...a network, help many investments to run a large number of irrigational projects by donors, UN, US...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, still, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 43.0788530466 7% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 251.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88844621514 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17084923209 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.689243027888 0.524837075471 131% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.55494732 48.9658058833 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.75 100.406767564 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262718224105 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133042625591 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127007891326 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125287343991 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389862116906 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 11.7677419355 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 14.63 58.1214874552 25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.1575268817 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 10.9000537634 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.84 8.01818996416 148% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.