Teachers have tremendous impact on our future, so without decent teacher it is quite challenging to meet our targets. From my point of view, evaluating teachers is very crucial, especially if it is implemented my students. I hold this statement for 3 main reasons, which I will explore in my following essay.
First of all, albeit majority of teacher were qualified in particular field, not all of them are capable of assessing themselves. Thus, sometimes students can become aware of teacher's flaw, which teacher doesn't notice, and by evaluating teacher, both students and teacher will benefit, because teacher will not repeat his or her mistake, and students will perceive accurate knowledge. For instance, I remember when my math teacher has disregarded false information that she said, and it could have engender students to comprehend topic in wrong way, but after I informed teacher regarding this flaw, she instantly corrected her mistake.
In addition, referring to my own subjective experience, when students are grading their teachers, teachers are getting more inclined to spend their class time more efficiently, in order not to have problems concerning time. For example, if student complains that his or her teacher can not convey all the essential information, automatically it will be inferred that teacher wastes her time. That's why, so as to not to be fired, teacher will not even waste her second.
Finally, and perhaps most significant point regarding this topic is certainly psychology of children and teenagers. According to scientific research, it has become evident that indeed when students judge teacher, it not only increases teacher's performance, but also strengthen students propensity towards particular subject. It is due to fact that, students assume that to analyze teacher in a more prices way, they have to be attentive while teacher is having class.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize one important point: being specified in certain field, is not the most crucial factor about teaching, in fact, being able to hear comments is more substantial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meeting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: meeting
... decent teacher it is quite challenging to meet our targets. From my point of view, eva...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e aware of teachers flaw, which teacher doesnt notice, and by evaluating teacher, both...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... false information that she said, and it could have engender students to comprehe...
^^
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'engendered'.
Suggestion: engendered
...ation that she said, and it could have engender students to comprehend topic in wrong w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hers, teachers are getting more inclined to spend their class time more efficient...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... inferred that teacher wastes her time. Thats why, so as to not to be fired, teacher ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hat teacher wastes her time. Thats why, so as to not to be fired, teacher will not even ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30120481928 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81481987274 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6923076923 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.384615385 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1538461538 5.45110844103 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0616937356435 0.236089414692 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239472719523 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285233282029 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0353773947137 0.150856017488 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238004987325 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.