Both passage and lecture are regarding possibility of maintaining human presence on Venus. Although author clarifies disadvantages that may be encountered on Venus, lecturer contradicts it by claiming some resolution to that particular problems.
Firstly, author accentuates that atmospheric pressure on Venus is 90 times greater comparing to earth's, which may lead to certain problems, such as all the items or spacecrafts that are landed may be damaged or even destroyed . On the other hand, lecturer elaborates solution that might be made concerning this topic. He declares that people can establish station that is 50 km above the surface, and pressure at that level is roughly equal to those on Earth.
Secondly, according to the author, there is not specific water reservoirs on Venus, so water has to be transported from Earth to Venus, which is quite problematic. However, lecturer asserts that indeed establishing station 50 km above surface could have again engender to solution. Moreover, lecturer holds the statement that using the elements that are prevalent on Venus, some reactions that results in water can be conducted.
Thirdly, author emphasize the point that very little sunlight reaches the surface, and 60 percent of the sunlight that reaches is reflected by thick clouds that exist on atmosphere. That being said, lecturer opposes this idea by presenting counterargument that cloud that are spread on 50 km above the surface aren't thick comparing to those at lower levels, so station may absorb or collect the sunlight that reaches surface or reflected back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... landed may be damaged or even destroyed . On the other hand, lecturer elaborates ...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'engendered'.
Suggestion: engendered
...on 50 km above surface could have again engender to solution. Moreover, lecturer holds t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...t are spread on 50 km above the surface arent thick comparing to those at lower level...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.344 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81272643129 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.370697914 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.6 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06452816374 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16427224882 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754729145452 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810936040606 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108631010332 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671805449624 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.