Should cars be banned from town centres in order to reduce traffic and pollution? If so, how should people get around instead?
Nowadays urban areas are intensely fulfilled with cars and everything turns around it. But whereas cities have already vertically increased, the quantity of cars are increasing still and with it, some odds.
Back to the very last century's very beginning, streets were where people would gather with each other and have their recreation moments in general. However, their space became more and more invaded by automobiles, such as cars and motorcycles. As a result, relaxation moments have been limited to happen among, for instance, some pub or restaurant walls. Thereby, regarding this situation, cities as São Paulo are trying to recover this past habit by means of closing the main city avenue for cultural and familiar events every Sunday, providing a vision of how a car-free city could work well.
A city with an overcrowded car population aspect not only increases air pollution, but the illness of citizens' mental health as well, once the everyday traffic has a tendency to provoke a higher stress level. Back to the cafes, pubs, restaurants and alike, free-car cities' residents and tourists, such as Venice's, highlight the difference which a noiseless and calm ambient offers. Another positive aspect to discuss is how the environmentally-friendly ambient influences healthier habits on people, once, without cars and with less pollution, they became more energetic to work better and to change habits - ride a bike and use public transport more frequently for example.
Therefore, the likelihood of free-car initiative improving the population's health is high. However, it would only work if the government worked to not only to improve the public transport system and create cycle lanes, but to organize more cultural events as well. Moreover, awareness campaigns aimed at environmentally-friendly habits and its positive effects would be extremely necessary, in order to create a society's collaboration with the project and increase the search for alternatives and available vehicles such as public ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populations'' or 'population's'?
Suggestion: populations'; population's
...od of free-car initiative improving the populations health is high. However, it would only ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4380952381 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03991729821 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625396825397 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0041766047 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.45110844103 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858468600024 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328739479677 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190262361905 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054311923436 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00919434840875 0.0645574589148 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.