Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment?
(l) Commute by biking or walking (2) Recycling (3) Eating a vegan diet
Whereas climate change’s condition debate is becoming hodiernal, its negative circumstances, as pointed out on New York City’s Climate Clock - a panel in which has a countdown to an irreversible climate crisis, are widening as well. In this sense, it is more than essential to, in first place, understand the major causes of this phenomenon to, thereafter, manage to weaken this state of breakdown.
In this regard, highlighting the cattle raising's problematic is noteworthy, once the sector assigns the most environmentally unfriendly position possible. At such a juncture, apart from meat production being problematic itself, cows alone give off methane gas emissions, which is extremely harmful for ozone layer - directly affecting global warming. Cutting down on meat, thus, would be a great alternative in terms of environment aiding.
Furthermore, considering that globalization cannot be related to social equality, it may be inferred that veganism is elitized on account of some specific brands' monopoly. Those labels, however, are usually tied up with the meat industry, which means, for instance, that a meat factory may be in charge of not only vegan meat, but vegan products in general and their line production - raising, consequently, the limited and exclusive line’s price, making it harder to be adept of a vegan diet.
Therefore, even though opting for a meat free diet corresponds to a preferable choice, it is restricted still. Because of this bias, we may conclude that veganism must be democratized, as its inaccessible character prevails and when it seems to be more approachable, it is possibly just for those who are from good socioeconomic conditions or who are contributing with some major industry, which adverse from ideals such as prioritize our environment welfare.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atic itself, cows alone give off methane gas emissions, which is extremely harmfu...
^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meat, thus, would be a great alternative in terms of environment aiding. Furthe...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brands'' or 'brand's'?
Suggestion: brands'; brand's
...is elitized on account of some specific brands monopoly. Those labels, however, are us...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 281.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42704626335 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10339536398 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665480427046 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.6267427248 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.444444444 100.406767564 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.1111111111 5.45110844103 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1510128488 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578426344013 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382693437675 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086212084166 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463440152471 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 11.7677419355 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.