It is a complex issue whether to preserve or destroy and replace the old buildings. Some argue that we should save ancient, historical edifice and others believe that these should be raised down and substituted with the current designs. While most of the historical buildings should be kept safe, some of these old structures could be superseded. This essay will discuss why some old buildings should be destroyed.
We should preserve historical buildings because these are the points for the tourists’ attraction. Tourists come to visit a city by considering its historical aspects and then they use hotels, transport, other museums. The Jinnah Hall in Sargodha, for example, is a historical landmark and point of interest for tourists. It is named for the founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah. In this way, these old structures generate a lot of revenue and prestige for the town through tourism. For these reasons, we should preserve such buildings as our heritage.
Conversely, there are some old buildings in the cities those should be raised down to avoid serious problems and accidents. These include old school’s edifices, haunted ones, and abandoned structures to name but a few. For example, one of the buildings of a school in my village collapsed last year and caused the death of thirteen students and one teacher. In short, we should destroy these buildings and reconstruct in a modern style or we can utilize these spaces for some other purpose.
In conclusion, we should protect historical buildings as our heritage to the extent possible; however, old and haunted buildings that might cause an accident and affect human lives should be reconstructed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22426470588 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80943700954 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8263714167 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7333333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268065054332 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103491432973 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584230360888 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178791436379 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229857339033 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.