Nowadays internet service and public transportation are essential to our daily life. I disagree to compare each other's importance because they all contribute a lot in improving social convenience and elevate our economy as well.
With the internet, we are able to connect people around the world without limitations of geological distance. From the business perspective, the global trade is inevitable. Negotiating prices for products regarding export and import is a regular schedule among many enterprises. Educationally, online classes and training materials have been popular for almost a decade, which provides learners more opportunities and much easier way to access knowledge they long for, moreover, the online university programs also benefit countless students around the world who are craving for the advanced education.
Public transportation is also crucial to our society. With more developments concerning industries and economics, more pollution are generated. Some services built by government such as High Speed Rail, MRT system, and city buses are effective methods to reduce air pollution because they are the substitutes of cars and motorcycles. Furthermore, those traffic infrastructures make people to meet faster and easier, which enhance the business activities and create more job opportunities for people who get the chance to commute.
In order to make our country a better place for citizens and the future generations, I encourage the government should continue investing on internet and transportation services. This action will not only make the air cleaner but also increase the money influx by reason of the convenience it brings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... daily life. I disagree to compare each others importance because they all contribute ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 251.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67330677291 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06944640709 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665338645418 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0155750901 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206884998591 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680904951357 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829537453924 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119283405848 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719637908349 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.