Various conditions in different regions might lead to a discrepant option on whether subsidize roads and highways or public transportation. Well, I hold the view that spending money on the former one might be a better choice according to my experience. However, some persons disagree with this assertion on account of their own consideration. And I will illustrate my opinion with reasons by the conjunction of economic development, the employment rate and citizens' lives.
First and foremost, the improvement of roads and highways might be more efficient to the development of economy in a city. Initially, the enhancement of the roads makes the transportation from others cities more rapidly, which correspondingly attracts more trucks and wares importing towards our cities. Furthermore, the convenience of the highways might be another attraction to enterprises and investors paying more attention on our cities' progression and investing their money to the industrial districts. Comparably, the economic advantage brought by spending money on public transportation is the efficiency of the commute. Accordingly, option to improve highways and roads, combining possible income from import and potential economic proliferation bringing about by investment, is better.
Also, from the employment rate aspect, investment on roads and highways shows more benefits on employment. The expansion of the economy growth might lead to an industrial enlargement such as the mass production and new factories founded. So there is a corresponding increasing demand on workers and directors for those production and manufactories. Apparently, this approach will decrease the unemployment rate and also attract more employees from other cities to work here. In contrast, whereas subsidizing the public transportation can only offer several occupations like drivers and repairers, so the rate is unable to be more drastically influenced.
Last but not least, the recreation will be more various if the highways towards other places are more time-saving. In the past, if individuals must cost 2 hours to go to a place of interest located in an adjacent area, in all likelihood, people would not spend that much of time to entertain themselves. But, nowadays, with the development and perfect of the highways, people are able to not only spend their time to nearby famous places but also can have meals or go camping to other cities only in half an hour. On the contrary, options to enhance the transportation will not show this effect. Indeed, subsidizing the roads and highways provide more entertainment with citizens.
All in all, surging economy, higher employment rate and abundant recreation are the three main reasons why I choose the former option, to invest the roads and highways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lic transportation is the efficiency of the commute. Accordingly, option to improve highway...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this production' or 'those productions'?
Suggestion: this production; those productions
...ing demand on workers and directors for those production and manufactories. Apparently, this app...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.0752688172 396% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47563805104 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13940062157 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533642691415 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4060867572 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217253170189 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663992843071 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485287433834 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115377058893 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537734603221 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.