Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents
I think that education need be for all students, being they with any talent or not. Since have children that have facility to learn and others not. Hence, I don’t agree with the sentence that society should indentify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to devolp their talents, because education need be for all.
First, since educaton is for all, every children can have the same oportunity. However all people there are differents facilities, like someone prefer math others history and other biologic science, and when the children is separated or have mor attention is not good because can make other childrens fell inferior. I’ve been reading about learnig and pscologist said that when the teatcher are teaching need treat all studens equal, because when don’t do that can ental many problems in students. For exemple, when I was in elementary school I had difficult to learning lenguage, and my friend to learning math, the school made a lot supplementary activites for helps everbody, without anyone.
Second, rich people can have favor on this question, due to chance that the children have, like good schools. Private school is good because have less studens per class and more time. For Exemple, this can be observed in the university, the majory of students have been studed in particular school.This is for me not good, since that have more public school than private, implying that people need be treat semilary. Therefore, stay evident that who have money have more chance and better school.
Third, the ability of children is differents, and the investment in talents need be for all students. For instance, there are many schools that have competitions and activities to encorage the students to emprove your ability, and I think it is a good ideia, since that envolve differents sort of talents. Like on higt school, there are competition of chemistry, biology, literature and others. Thus, this activity make good for students.
In conclusion, I don’t agree completely with this argument, since that if say that need invest more in children that have spacial talent. Therefore, I belive that all children need be same oportunity since that education is forr all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... children can have the same oportunity. However all people there are differents facilit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...are differents facilities, like someone prefer math others history and other biologic ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... schools. Private school is good because have less studens per class and more tim...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...s have been studed in particular school.This is for me not good, since that have mor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in particular, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14092140921 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55182978544 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.197090557 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27388008737 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982797998642 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123274428539 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169964316555 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139708666849 0.0645574589148 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.