Some companies decided to not permit employees to reply the e-mail or text assciated with the work in the holliday or on weekends. Some people think that this policy will improve satisfaction of employees. While other argue that policy. What do you think?
Today there is no shortage of debate that forbidding employees to reply on e-mails or some messages, whose connected with work, will definitely facilitate their lives. However, a lot of people have an opposite point of view. They suppose that it will be additional load for employees to answered on those message during the work time. From my point of view, this new policy, which banned the reply to e-mails, will definitely facilitate worker`s lives, and I feel this way for some reasons.
First of all, if employees have to receive on e-mails or messages, they will not get enough rest, during their vacations. Ii goes without saying that every single person should have enough time to relax and bring his thought in order. Nevertheless, it will be just impossible for employees, if they have to answer to work message. Moreover, they will avoid a lot of time to do it, because notification associated with work are usually demand a lot of time. According to my father experience, he always spends more than three hours per day to receive all e-mails while his vacation.
Secondly, there are a large number of forfeits for employees, who did not receive a message. It is common knowledge that a lot of companies want to attract employee`s attention only on work, so they decided to establish some extra fines for workers, who do not give any answer for company`s messages. Furthermore, those penalties do not give employees any opportunity to have a rest and also will be complement stress for workers. According to the statistic, every third worker in Russia is suffer from serious depression due to the fact that he loses more than thirty percent of his wage on fines.
Finally, this new policy will improve the quality of worker`s rest. It is definitely true that not only quantity of time is vital, but also the quality of recreation. According to the article, which I read one day, the scientists wanted to know the importance of rest`s quality, so they decided to make an experiment. The gathered two hundreds of people and divided them on two groups. First group had the greatest duration of vacation, but those people were under stress during all this time. Second group had less time of the rest, but they relax during this time. In the end of experiment, second group had the less rate of stress than the first group. So, it is crucial for employees to have a rest without any introductions.
By the way of conclusion, based on arguments explored above, it is well-known fact that new policy for employees will increase not only their satisfaction, but also will give them an opportunity to relax fully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this message' or 'those messages'?
Suggestion: this message; those messages
...ional load for employees to answered on those message during the work time. From my point of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'demanded'.
Suggestion: demanded
...cation associated with work are usually demand a lot of time. According to my father e...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hile his vacation. Secondly, there are a large number of forfeits for employees, who did not rec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...tistic, every third worker in Russia is suffer from serious depression due to the fact...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'two hundred'.
Suggestion: two hundred
...ded to make an experiment. The gathered two hundreds of people and divided them on two groups. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, well, while, i feel, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87139689579 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72532153085 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6107879595 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8636363636 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196416956718 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588754015117 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506794758563 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115643141778 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506555936125 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.