Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In recent years, there has been opposite views in the ways to fight the traffic congestion. Some people are of the opinion that the government should spend on building trains and subways where as others contend that constructing more and wider roads is the best way to reduce traffic. Considering human needs and safety, I strongly believe that the government should fund the railway and subway projects for two reasons.
To begin with, trains and subways are relatively safer and secured as far as the public safety is concerned. For example, the roadways are well-developed in Texas in USA. While taking a an online driving certification test, I learned that the rate of road traffic accidents has dramatically increases in Texas in the this decade as compared to the last one costing number of precious and innocent human lives. The victims suffer from lifelong disabilities or families lose their loved ones for no reason. These painful events can be impeded to a large extend if people avoid driving cars and commute through public transportation services like trains.
In addition, development and use of local railways and subways by the civilians will curtail the environmental harms caused by the humans. Widening and increasing the driving lanes will not reduce the running cars on the road but also promote the citizens to use personal means of transport over the public ones. The fuel burned while driving the cars is realising the harmful gases in environment thus accelerating global climate change and global warming. I came across a news article recently which claims that the CO2 index has reached the alarming limit in Delhi and Bangalore in India. As repercussion the public is suffering from more pulmonary illnesses which is affecting their quality of life. It seems we humans are digging our own grave. Lately, many countries have agreed with WHO to fight the environmental pollution by developing sprawling the public transportation but unfortunately, US did not. Certainly, similar to United Kingdom, if the federal system of United States of America raises funds to build more efficient railway and subway systems all over the country, it can definitely contribute to save the global environment.
To recapitulate, I subscribe the idea of funding and constructing more railway lines by the government. This will not only ensure public safety but also fight the environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ld spend on building trains and subways where as others contend that constructing more a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...developed in Texas in USA. While taking a an online driving certification test, I...
^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
...developed in Texas in USA. While taking a an online driving certification test, I le...
^^^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
... has dramatically increases in Texas in the this decade as compared to the last one cost...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... The fuel burned while driving the cars is realising the harmful gases in environment thus a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... limit in Delhi and Bangalore in India. As repercussion the public is suffering fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18717948718 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79292451571 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8749981407 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.388888889 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231649763759 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651534002076 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1236134412 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162546195774 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191788282805 0.0645574589148 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.