Some people believe that the media (for example: television, radio, newspapers, or Internet news sources) are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past. These people argue that the media today often present incorrect information about news stories and that this causes problems for the public. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
News and its reliability is a very important issue that causes so many controversies. In this regard, there is a controversial view that argues new sources of media in these days are less concerned about the accuracy of their news and this causes some problems to people. Although this might be true in some aspects, it is not true in general because it does not acknowledge some facts about the news.
First, it should be admitted that since the communication has experienced a huge growth in the past century, the probability that people are not aware of a particular issue or news is much less than the past. Therefore, the media cannot cheat on the information or news and has to produce more reliable news because if they do not so, people will be informed really soon and that media will lose its trust. this revolution in communication has led to more resources of the news and this variety of media news may lower the probability of monopoly of the news empire. The more medias on the field, the less probability of a special media can take over the whole news industry and lead people to its own interest and false news.
Secondly, there is a trend in recent years that the numbers of private medias have been increased and with this increase, more reliable and accurate news medias can be found. Within the past years, most of the news agencies were held by national governments and the other non-governmental medias were still influenced by governments. With the growth of private companies in all different fields, there was a great opportunity for private news media to be able to emerge in the news field. With more and more private medias and news agencies, people can provide with more news resources, and since the private news medias are less concerned to be influenced by governments or regimes, the probability of producing false and incorrect news has reduced. Additionally, with the help of private news resources, the free flow of news and information helped people to choose a reliable source of information, which does not cause them any harm.
In conclusion, we know that with the spectacular growth of communication and the emerge of new private medias, there are less false news than before. The new world has provided us a more prosperous future with less incorrect and false news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...oon and that media will lose its trust. this revolution in communication has led to ...
^^^^
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...spectacular growth of communication and the emerge of new private medias, there are less f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as to, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86683417085 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70209280421 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44472361809 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.762112026 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.357142857 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303017308079 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12390069784 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04603474277 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187406334053 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554515334362 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.