Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor.
Friendship is one of the most important relationships a person has in his or her life. Sometimes people wonder if they should have a smart friend or a fun friend who can make them laugh. Although people need miscellaneous kinds of friends from intelligent to funny or from very serious to not serious friends, I believe that humorous friends can benefit us more than smart friends in our life.
First, funny friends who have a huge amount of sense of humor can make life more enjoyable. When people go with their funny friends, they enjoy the moments of life without too much thinking about the very routine lifestyle that everybody has, full of anxiety and thinking about the future and forgetting the NOW time. Although spending time with smart friends can have some advantages such as imagining the future of life, having experience about jobs or other important issues, and receiving valuable consultants about our life, everybody wants to have fun moments to enjoy its life. What is life if a person has achieved his or her goals, but has not spent enough time in fun and enjoyed his or her life.
Additionally, humorous friends are people who can make difficult times in life easier to tolerate. Life is full of up and down moments. Nobody could claim that life is always nice and without hardships. However, the important point in this matter is that people should bear these difficult conditions to come to those points in which they can watch their past and be proud of themselves. Fun friends are the best choice to help individuals in these hard times who can help people forget about their problems and make optimistic comments about life, which can be sometimes tough enough to make people think just about pessimistic views of it. Although astute friends can suggest us some decisions that can help us to make a logical action, fun friends can assist us to gain energy and think about life more positively.
In conclusion, I believe that fun friends can be more beneficial in life than astute friends. Although people require to enjoy both groups in different circumstances, the advantages of fun friends are more important than intelligent friends, since they help individuals have enjoyable moments in life and forget about their tough problems, which everybody could face during his or her life. What can make the world a better place than a friend who always makes us smile?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 119, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enjoying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: enjoying
...astute friends. Although people require to enjoy both groups in different circumstances,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89486552567 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48023252423 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440097799511 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2407143053 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5625 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219625264391 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983760550125 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951567927765 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179306425147 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598041922588 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.