Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks.

It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all parents have always been involved in a great struggle to do their best to educate their children different aspects of life. Whereas some people debate that parents should not give money to their children for doing any home affair, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that it is much better for children to be paid by parents for doing any tasks at home. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by the underlying and conspicuous reasons.

To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that one of the most paramount points paying money to children for doing any job at home is that this issue really motivates them to find a part-time job when they are studying at high school because every person definitely likes money. Consequently, they can easily earn money and it clearly stimulates them to be independent in the near future. Under such a circumstance, they are able to construct their future by saving their money by taking a part-time job. An example can shed some light on this subject remarkably. Several years ago when I was an elementary student, for most of the time, my parents gave a small amount of money to me when I washed the dishes after lunch and dinner. This phenomenon actually incited me to find a part-time job in McDonald because I was really involved in saving money for my future. After a couple of years, I save a large amount of money and rented an apartment apart from my parents and started living independently. Therefore, if they did not pay a small amount of money to me when I was washing the dishes in childhood, I would have never motivated to find a part-time job and would not have saved money.

Having discussed the issue from my previous perspective, I would rather look at it from another standpoint. Another exquisite point regarding paying money to children when they do any tasks at home is that parents can obviously educate them on how to do their tasks individually in the future. It is apparent that all human beings need to live alone for several years after eighteen years old until being married to a person. In such a situation, it is very beneficial for him to know how he should do his tasks at home. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, my parents also taught me how to do home affairs such as washing dishes, clothes, cleaning, plumbing, and some electrical works when I am alone at home. I really believe that if they did not educate me those affairs, I would have not really enabled to live alone in that apartment until becoming familiar with a girl in my life.

In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of the opinion that paying money to children for performing home affairs is considerably constructive for them in the future. This is because this issue can be a great motivation for them to get a part-time job and earn money, and also it is a great method to teach them how to live without their parents or any individual in the near future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, if, look, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, whereas, apart from, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2670.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 570.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70346494039 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436842105263 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 853.2 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.767688932 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321357171978 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937560903624 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879268290157 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212182038551 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662589152825 0.0645574589148 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.