Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Since the dawn of civilization, Foods played a vital role in each society. Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants because of variety of reasons. However, others take radically different point and believe that eating at home is better and offers many opportunities. From my vantage point, I am with the former group. The lines, above, will shed light on my viewpoint.

First of all, I am an engineering student at MIT University. My schedule is so heavy. When final exams came, going to a restaurant helps me to motivate better: therefore, eating at outside is amazing opportunity for me. Furthermore, you can get rid of the things like watching the dishes, clearing the kitchen.

Secondly, today parents are too tired to do home chores such as cooking, cleaning the house or taking care the kids. After a tough working day, eating at a restaurant is an amazing option. Thus they can spend time with kids. Moreover, another drawback of cooking at home is about abilities. You must have skill to cook. It is hard to cook, if you do not know it.

To sum up, taking all aforementioned into the account, one cannot deny that eating outside helps people. You cannot waste your time while you cook. What is more, not all people have ability to cook at home

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...g at a restaurant is an amazing option. Thus they can spend time with kids. Moreover...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, first of all, to sum up, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1977.66487455 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72197309417 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5687357486 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.690582959641 0.524837075471 132% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 618.680645161 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6851797736 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.5 100.406767564 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3888888889 20.6045352989 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301431490783 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806984530476 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101716700167 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165430205723 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075537968212 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.