Some people prefer to see movies based on true facts and events rather than completely fictional movies about imaginary people and places One reason for this preference is that movies based on actual events allow viewers to learn from other people s real | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to see movies based on true facts and events, rather than completely fictional movies about imaginary people and places. One reason for this preference is that movies based on actual events allow viewers to learn from other people's real-life experience.

Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? Why?

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.

Many people refer to movie based on true events rather than frictional movies because they think they can learn other's real-life experience from movies based on facts. From my perspective, I disagree with it.
Firstly, people can also learn a lot of life experience from the imaginary characters because they are all based on the real-life people. Though the characters in the movies are not real, people can relate them to the reality and get inspiration from them. For example, in the fictional movie "The Wondering Earth”, Duoduo was a teenage girl who was a little childish at first, but in a disaster, she played an important role and became more matured. Her experience might help many people learn to face with the challage bravely, and improve themselves in this process. People can learn from all the characters even if they are imaginary, and apply what they have learnt in the reality.
Secondly, fictional movies can provide us with a broader image of the world and inspire people to think more deeply, especially about the future. That is something the movie based on true facts cannot provide, because they are limited to the real word. For example, in the movie Galactic Empire, there are many high-tech devices that make lives more convenient, like the vehicle that can fly from one planet to a another in a short time. Also, there are all kinds off political system in different places. So after watching the movie, the audience can imagine what will the technology in the future be like, or which politic system will people choose in the future. However, in the movies that based on real events, it often talks about the current issue in the society, so it won’t inspire people to imagine about the far future.
In conclusion, people can learn a lot of experience from characters in fictional movies, and also imagine the far future. So I prefer to watch fictional movies.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...ictional movie 'The Wondering Earth”, Duoduo was a teenage girl who was a li...
^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...vehicle that can fly from one planet to a another in a short time. Also, there ar...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87962962963 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42681909547 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8769547741 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403337392163 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134338690761 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988561375192 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26374417996 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086468116583 0.0645574589148 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.