Some people prefer to work with a small company whether there are few coworkers, while others prefer to work in a large company or organization in which there are thousands of employees?
Which would you choose? Why?
In today's sophisticated world, people devote considerable time to career announcements to guide them for finding a company that leads them to a prosperous future. Although some people believe that they should attend small corporations to succeed in life, I firmly believe that they should participate in the firms with tremendous employees' network on which I will elaborate my reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, big organizations boost employees' success in a shorter period by providing better job opportunities and professional knowledge. In big companies, workers face different job positions with the same titles, which help them to grab the seats by specializing in a specific field. In contrast, in small companies, employees have to do different positions' duties with one title to promote. Moreover, in big companies, employees have a vast network of colleagues in the same field, which would lead them to collaborate and learn professional knowledge, while this would not occur in small ones. Recent researches have shown that the rate of the workers' income, which is related to their job position and profession, grows dramatically in the big companies rather than small ones, so the more company's population increase, the more workers' success opportunities would increase.
Moreover, attending a vast network helps people to learn management method more efficient. To be more specific, in a bigger work society, people have to learn many management attitudes, such as: allocating time to subprojects, stimulating yourself and colleagues to do the jobs correctly, and learning social behaviors to provide sufficient teamwork. For instance, I participated in the Sapco Company, one of the Iran Khodro's sub-companies, five years ago, and started to attend their consultant and discussion. Then, I faced many of their struggles in my own business, and if I had not participated in their debate, and had not achieved their managing method, I have not been able to conquer my problems.
To sum up, communicating with numerous coworkers not only helps to learn managing concepts, but it also accelerates the climbing of the success ladder. In this regard, I suggest that freshman and junior workers attend big companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...earches have shown that the rate of the workers income, which is related to their job p...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 833, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... companys population increase, the more workers success opportunities would increase. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to manage'.
Suggestion: to manage
...erous coworkers not only helps to learn managing concepts, but it also accelerates the c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40857142857 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07267217349 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4518621439 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.615384615 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178905014915 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588152374357 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452080002584 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943437277896 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608955770838 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.