With advent of cutting-edge technology, the Internet plays a significant role in people's daily life. A vast majority of them take the Internet as a tool of communication, playing games and searching for academic resources. Nonetheless, some people claim that having access to much information providing by the Internet creates problems. As far as I am concerned, this standpoint is a piece of overemphasis.
First of all, the Internet can assist students in getting a deep understanding of the knowledge they don't fully absorb in the class. Substantial resources of learning contribute to enlightening students to great extent. Based on the fact that teachers are not always around students and parents are possible not equipped with enough knowledge to guide them, the Internet with no doubt, is an ideal alternative to teachers and parents, which not only can provide a variety of information at any time but also never get troubled by endless questions. Therefore, the Internet will improve students' academic performance, enabling parents to get rid of the burden of assisting their kids.
Secondly, the information providing by the Internet can expand people's outlook. Due to the financial consideration, a part of people have no chance to go aboard to experience different cultures or communicate with native people. Fortunately, the Internet can bridge the gap. If you tap a word: America in browser, hundreds of thousands of entries crowd in, which satisfies your curiosity with a wealth of introductions and beautiful pictures. Also, the social media connecting people from different countries remove the barrier of remote communication. Thus, never downplay the role of the Internet in cultural communication.
In addition, people can invariably avoid the trap of information explosion. As is common sense, most things serve as double-edged swords. The water that bears the boats is the same that swallows it up. The knife can be harmful to people, but that doesn't impede its popular application as a tool for cutting vegetables. The idea behind this fact is simple that if you know how to control the disadvantages, you are the one who enjoys its advantages. Clearly, managing yourself is an essential to address the problem causing by much information.
To sum up, the Internet is not a bundle of negatives. It helps to get a deeper understanding of knowledge, to expand one's outlook, and its negative impacts can be solved by managing oneself. Therefore, I firmly agree with that the Internet provides people with valuable information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eep understanding of the knowledge they dont fully absorb in the class. Substantial ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to contribute'
Suggestion: to contribute
...lass. Substantial resources of learning contribute to enlightening students to great exten...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nife can be harmful to people, but that doesnt impede its popular application as a too...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ation as a tool for cutting vegetables. The idea behind this fact is simple that if...
^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...r understanding of knowledge, to expand ones outlook, and its negative impacts can b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, no doubt, you know, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28431372549 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07241512778 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575980392157 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.4013098294 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7391304348 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7391304348 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293244685835 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801921634641 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103738056137 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165528764808 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066529391337 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.