Every coin has two sides. One is curse and another is boon. Tourism has also both types of effects as positive effects and negative effects. Firstly we will take a short look on to positive effects. It includes improvement of economical condition of that region. The area becomes well known for its tourism and naturals wonders. Furthermore we can see that there are two types of negative effects of tourism one including deterioration of natural environment and other is impact of tourist on local people.
Now we will see detailed effect on deterioration of nature. Sindhudurg, a city from India was famous for coral islands and clear sea water. As tourism and human interference in coral area increased the the area of coral area reduced drastically. Coral islands are very sensitive and they are slow growers. They take many years to grow and are important part of sea ecosystem as many fishes and other animal like sea horses breed in the coral areas. Many tourist from different region visit locality. If we take a look at history we can clearly see that tourist had played major role in spreading diseases like Ebola and HIV. Through diseased tourists any disease can be spread in local healthy people causing outbreaks.
To prevent such losses we should take some precautionary steps like limiting the number of visitors. This is successfully is being followed from last few years, in areas like forests, conserved area, mountains like mount Everest. Proper training of how to take care of nature should be given to tourists before entering in sensitive area. The outbreak of diseases can be prevented by prior vaccination of tourist as well as local people. The types of vaccines can be determined from the variety of visitors visiting the tourist places.
Sometimes tourist exchange their cultural habits with local people, impact of this can be observed when we can watch local people following different cultures from different area of world. Such changes can be considered as evolution of culture. But harmful effects should be avoided by following strict rules.
Many scientist and doctors suggested that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...n for its tourism and naturals wonders. Furthermore we can see that there are two types of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...an interference in coral area increased the the area of coral area reduced drastically....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...an interference in coral area increased the the area of coral area reduced drastically....
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be avoided by following strict rules. Many scientist and doctors suggested tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many scientists'.
Suggestion: Many scientists
...oided by following strict rules. Many scientist and doctors suggested that
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09428571429 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57923418471 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3413760656 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2916666667 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251965172335 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651538462233 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674217724258 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134352768605 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621682499241 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.