sales
To increase the sales author has given three different basic principles while speaker stated that new research findings are against traditional basic principles. This research was conducted by collaborating the efforts of scientist and near about 500 different company. The speaker contradicts the points regarding to the principles, as stated in passage by giving advanced research conclusions.
Firstly, he points out that, author says, more calls will give more orders for this purpose sales person supposed to contact more people. However, according to speaker this is misconception. In reality, he explains that if sales person is spending more time on calling customers then their will be less time for preparation for the same. Furthermore, reduced preparation time will affect the quality of calls.
Secondly, he opposes the second principle given in the passage regarding calling higher position authorities as well. he clarifies that in practice, it is quiet contrary. sales will be same if we are contacting any position authority. He explains that to call higher position more preparation will be needed and again same problem of preparing less will occur.
Thirdly he denies the validity of the point that was given in the passage with regards to deadline to increase the sales as well as creating sense of urgency. Due to this according to speaker there will be less time for concerns of customers, summarizing and benefit explanation.
Speaker casts doubts by saying that preparation time is important. Hence in conclusion, speaker lucidly substantiates his points of view with cogency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ng higher position authorities as well. he clarifies that in practice, it is quiet...
^^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sales
...that in practice, it is quiet contrary. sales will be same if we are contacting any p...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 68, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ing that preparation time is important. Hence in conclusion, speaker lucidly substant...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49800796813 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83143909496 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545816733068 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8435732373 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15979372051 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575066834566 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842508748994 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907186731658 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505847954192 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.