It is now common for children to take field trips to museums or the wild. While some people oppose the ideal and rather have their kids spend time in school, I firmly support the idea. I think field trips can be beneficial for several reasons, which I will examine in this essay.
For starters, going on field trips can teach children certain knowledge that cannot be learned in class. In my opinion, learning can be anything; it does not matter if it comes from the textbook or else. Having a broad view can develop children’s potential interests. My personal experience can demonstrate this. I am an audiophile, as people called so, and the main reason can trace back to a trip in high school. There happened to be an international expo of electronics in town, which our class had the privilege to attend. It was there I saw some cool headphones and pick up my hobbies for today. If our school did not have such trips, I could not find my passion.
Second, field trips open up a new mind for studying. Traditional teaching methods have many limitations, like confined space and restricted materials. A great example of this would be in the biology course. The school lab is the best place to go for biology, but even it has some disadvantages. For example, you cannot observe or collect data of a plant or animal that moves in the wild, like flowers, for example, which grow naturally in nature. A field trip to a flower field will allow students to learn everything, whereas it is hard to look and examine a specimen that probably perished for many weeks or even months.
Granted, some subjects do not benefit much through field trips, one of them being math. It is true that we learn equations and numbers on the blackboard, but that does not mean outdoor trips can be entirely useless. In fact, mathematicians seak the truth by nature like the Fibonacci series, which can be seen by the patterns on flowers. Nature is truly amazing as you can find every information or equation out there. Furthermore, learning outdoors gives children a deeper understanding which will be hard to forget rather than just pouring knowledge into their heads.
Though field trips cannot be the bulk of studying, their benefits and impact are well worth the time. Thus, I propose the education department approve more activities for the good of the students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, second, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, i think, in fact, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73188405797 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58423516181 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567632850242 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2670463149 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.36 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.56 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213714724011 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590732047617 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497492655897 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131493257274 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655186099569 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.