Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to
improve public transportation.
There is no shortage of opinion on the money spending by the money on the internet by the government. While some people think it is more sensible to spend this money on improving public transportation, I definitely choose to disagree. It is my firm belief that the government should spend more funding to enhance internet access than public transportation for two reasons, which I will develop in the subsequent paragraph.
To begin with, the internet gives broader access than transportations. You can literally see the entire world with a click which is amazing. For example, before the internet was available in my region, I had a limited view of the world. I could only imagine what it is like in other countries, or the food and culture there. Then the internet came and changed my life dramatically. Now, I can communicate with my friend on the other side of the sea, see the beautiful scenery across the globe, and many things beyond imagined before. It is not too much to say that this technology has become an essential part of my life. For this reason, the government should spend more on internet development.
Secondly, the internet offers more value than transportations. In fact, the top most companies in the world are all based on internet service. It is intriguing that before, the top ones were mainly oil and airlines cooperations. Let me just list a few examples. Amazon, one of the biggest stock companies out there, provides online shopping services based on internet access. The stock market for this company has risen to a significant height, to which, the profit is even higher than a single Asian country’s total GDP. Meanwhile, the oil giants and transportation companies are experiencing a decline in the market. It is no doubt that the internet is the future for every country, and whoever seizes the opportunity first will take advantage. Another reason to invest more in internet access.
Finally, I do not see the need in funding public transportations anymore. Develop countries today already have a compact and effective transporting system. For instance, most cities now are equipped with subways or electric buses. The metropolitan systems offer a wide choice for citizens to travel. In other words, public transports are matured enough, which means it is pointless to pour more money into it.
In light of the reasons I mentioned above, I strongly believe that governments should concentrate more on internet access and development rather than investing in public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in fact, no doubt, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09375 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92211898366 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2859260065 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375465280493 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920265140694 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075034283438 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209120377349 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805047925035 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.