It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to improve their general knowledge about different aspects of life and also have scientific views towards various topics. Consequently, the accuracy of that information plays a pivotal and crucial role in human’s hectic life. Whereas some individuals debate that getting information from the media is not a great idea because it is fallacious, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that the media such as newspapers, television, radio, and the Internet are precious and beneficial to all individuals. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that the rate of using advanced technology has increased over the past few years and the media such as the Internet is a competitive environment for persons who are really sources of news. If they consciously or advertently publish a scrap of fallacious and incorrect news, people will notify very rapidly and as a result, nobody will trust them to follow their news. Under such a circumstance, those resources will miss their followers which will not be financially lucrative for them in the near future. An example can shed some light on this subject distinctly. Several years ago, I followed the sports news form a renowned website called Varezesh3. This website earned a large amount of money from advertisements. One day, its employees made a mistake and published a piece of incorrect news about a soccer player. This person complained and the office of that website was closed rapidly. At that time, the website lost many of its fans and followers and nobody trusted them again after opening the office. If those individuals did not publish that news, the website’ income from advertisement would have been around one thousand dollars each day. I could remember that after that website, people followed another popular website under the name of Sport3.
Furthermore, one of the most controversial issues having been discussed among people is that whether news sources can publish the imprecise news or not. It is noteworthy to mention that any government definitely has several strict rules and restrictions to double check the truth of news. If a news source wants to provide a piece of inaccurate and fallacious news for people, it will absolutely be accused of publishing the wrong news and should pay much money to the government. In such a situation, it is crystal clear news sources do not have any chance to print out imprecise news. In the aforementioned examples, besides losing its followers, that website accused of paying around one million dollars to the government for publishing that news.
To wrap it up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that the information and data obtaining from the media can be actually correct. This is because if they want to publish fallacious news, they will dramatically charge with and they definitely lose their followers which is not really lucrative for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ctly. Several years ago, I followed the sports news form a renowned website called Var...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, furthermore, if, really, second, so, whereas, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2763.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 536.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15485074627 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90525692384 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0985557305 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.130434783 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3043478261 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220920130639 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599330128838 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456115974104 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138829042393 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215700479176 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.