Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Other think that it is always to have a teacher.
Nowadays, teachers play a pivotal role in the system of education in every country, and they have a responsibility to foster the children who will be ready in their near future. A crucial question raises is that people can learn everything without teachers contribute to teaching. Some people have the viewpoint that people should learn independently in terms of using their methods to learn. However, some people believe that teachers can ease the process of learning for everyone. In my opinion, the help of teachers is the inevitable part of education, and I explain my reasons about this view hereunder.
The first reason comes to my mind is that in the process of learning, people probably confront some difficulties due to the fact that they get a trouble to understand some concepts. Generally, teachers initially clarify all syllabuses for students, and then students clearly are informed about this section of the book is taught. As long as students have a blind spot to notice about this issue, they can ask their questions from teacher to explain this part. Also, some questions seem difficult for students, therefore, teachers with their knowledge present some tips to help students in order to solve questions. For example, my teacher told us his class is arbitrary for students to attend, so I decided I did not go his class and read all of the book lonely. However, in some tough questions, I felt some helps from my teacher, but I did not go to class. Eventually, I got a low score in the final exam since I could not grasp a sufficient concept from this course.
The second reason about this issue is that everyone has a specific identity in their life and particularly in education, also each person senses comfortable with a special method in terms of learning. On the contrary, students always use a conventional method due to learning and maybe use this method in the all educational stages. Probably, many these methods are useless and do not have a suitable efficient for learning. Teachers have various methods corresponded all types of students can pave the way for students to learn any material with their particular attribution. Therefore, students profoundly learn all materials and enjoy how their teachers teach them. Moreover, a teacher with optimum means can secure the success of students due to the fact that students really learn effectively what they should learn. As educational standpoint of Asian countries shows that students trying to learn independently are deprived of optimum ways that ease the path of learning. Therefore, their scores always lower than scores of students who are taught by teachers.
All in all, learning with teachers can provide several advantages to people who are appealing to increase their knowledge. Teachers not only can explain any part of the book that people are getting trouble to understand, but also make the numerous methods of learning to educate students accordingly their particular identity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 739, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...decided I did not go his class and read all of the book lonely. However, in some tough que...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arn effectively what they should learn. As educational standpoint of Asian countri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2489.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06924643585 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72523965871 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474541751527 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8593395479 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.136363636 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3181818182 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315375692915 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11407101925 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707029911949 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23112142531 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546130722307 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.