Some people stress the physical and mental distance between friends. They hold the view that only the distance can help people remind of the preciousness of our friends and cherish friends later on. However, others think that the distance between friends will cause damages and unfamiliarity between them. I agree with the latter assertion for several reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
To begin with, keeping close with our friends strengthens our relationship, especially when they are upset or helpless. When in difficulties or in low spirit, we find it comforting to have close friend around us. There is an old saying, "A friend in need is the friend indeed. For instance, last year I lose in a speech competition, which made me depressed. But, my friend Emily comforted me immediately, encouraged me by her own failure and analyzed the problem and mistakes during my competition. Instantly, I feel better and find the new impulse to endeavor for next year fight. Apparently, relationship can be strengthened by close interaction and needed assistance.
Furthermore, the distance can gradually erode the trust among friends if they have some misunderstandings. Immediate communication with friends, especially when there are a bit of controversies or misunderstandings, promotes and closes friendship. If friends don't meet with each other for a long time, the contradictory is unlikely to figure out. Take my friend’s experience as an example. My friends, Lydia, broke up with her boyfriend due to a long-distance relationship. Either of them has no time to meet with each other, therefore the misunderstanding between them is getting deeper and deeper. Consequently, their three-year-relationship comes to the end. The friendship is somehow identical with the love.
Also, we can know one's moral quality more rapidly if we can frequently get along with him/her. Frequent meet can hasten the exposure of friends' drawbacks. By this way, we are capable of discriminate good friends from bad. For instance, when I initially encountered a person, I thought he is polite, gentle and handsome. I had a good first impression to him, whereas after getting in touch with him for two weeks, I no longer interacted with him anymore. This is because he is squandered, often spends money on luxury, useless substances and will throw them away when he lost his interest on them. Indeed. Distance can engender people to find out their friends' true personalities quickly and decide whether they will meet with them again.
All in all, close interaction with friend is able to give assistants to friend in need, remove misinterpretation among them and figure out their true personalities. Thus, we have to stay close with our friends to strengthen our relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bits'?
Suggestion: bits
...th friends, especially when there are a bit of controversies or misunderstandings, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...motes and closes friendship. If friends dont meet with each other for a long time, t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 598, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...away when he lost his interest on them. Indeed. Distance can engender people to find o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, i feel, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26741573034 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22910792443 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566292134831 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8117018256 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7142857143 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8928571429 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03571428571 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230335399751 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627768977066 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547012035397 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128858949977 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019230413634 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.