some people think that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. what do you think?
In modern days, different individuals have various workstyles. Without a shadow of a doubt, the company's task arrangement plays important role in worker satisfaction. Some people advocate that companies distributing diverse types of tasks is more helpful for workers. Others maintain a contrary view that different tasks are detrimental to their concentration. While these ideas have their bases, they need to be scrutinized meticulously. In my opinion, variety is the spice of life, performing multiple tasks during the workday is more satisfying and has a more profound influence. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First of all, from a standpoint of mentality, performing various tasks leads to higher job satisfaction because it keeps employees engaged and motivated. When workers do the same task repeatedly, they are more likely to experience boredom and monotony, which can lead to decreased satisfaction and productivity. In contrast, diverse tasks keep them challenged and receive a fresh feeling. My friend's experience is an excellent example of this. She is an artist who has made a bit of a name for herself. Through her artworks, I can find many different subjects from mythical creatures such as little luminous critters and gigantic ancient dragons to science fiction vibe objects, for example, cyborgs in apocalyptic scenes and enormous spaceships above the horizon. She loves finding inspiration from books and movies or even from walking after dinner, she obtains a sense of fulfillment and it is a pleasure for her to challenge different topics by swapping tasks during the painting process. In other words, she feels more satisfied with variety than doing similar tasks all day long.
Moreover, in consideration of development, different tasks can also provide employees with opportunities to acquire new skills and knowledge, which can increase their contentment too. Workers may enhance their overall comprehension of the project and reach out to other aspects which are conducive to their future careers. For instance, as a 3D graphic designer, I am not only interested in 3D characters but also environments, lighting, mechanical motions, special effects, and so forth. Spending time on different tasks throughout the day allows me to efficiently learn more about the industry and enhance my technical skills, on top of that, along with the exploration of different fields, I become more determined in the direction of my career that I should cultivate.
A voice rises that performing similar tasks all day long is more satisfying because it encourages people to develop expertise in their field. However, this argument overlooks the fact that the significance of creativity. Just like the story: The Fox and the Grape. The fox convinces itself that the grapes in the vineyard are probably sour because it fails too many times to catch them. In the context of work, if we find ourselves doing the same task repeatedly, we may cheat ourselves that it is not important to try new things. However, if we embrace diversity and new tasks, we may find that it leads to more chances to pop up new ideals and avoid falling into a bubble filter.
Therefore, reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, trying different topics or tasks in our work is a good way to hearten workers and exerts good influence in a myriad of facets. Not only benefits the contentment but also favorable to employees' future. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I believe my opponents will compromise after reading my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rself. Through her artworks, I can find many different subjects from mythical creatures such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3044.0 1977.66487455 154% => OK
No of words: 580.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24827586207 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90829720418 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 329.0 212.727598566 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56724137931 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 933.3 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6104702487 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313933177019 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714376143648 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807323271006 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152213292472 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721480679776 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 86.8835125448 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.